XXXX vs. ^GSPC

Performance

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Drawdowns

Volatility

XXXX vs. ^GSPC

Last updated Apr 27, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).

XXXX is a passively managed fund by Max that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 4, 2023.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XXXX or ^GSPC.

Correlation

The correlation between XXXX and ^GSPC is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Correlation: 1.0

Performance

XXXX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XXXX

^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XXXX:

-0.17

^GSPC:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

XXXX:

0.27

^GSPC:

0.77

Omega Ratio

XXXX:

1.04

^GSPC:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

XXXX:

-0.21

^GSPC:

0.47

Martin Ratio

XXXX:

-0.70

^GSPC:

1.94

Ulcer Index

XXXX:

18.93%

^GSPC:

4.61%

Daily Std Dev

XXXX:

76.58%

^GSPC:

19.44%

Max Drawdown

XXXX:

-62.27%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

XXXX:

-47.60%

^GSPC:

-10.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a -38.31% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -6.06% return.

XXXX

YTD

-38.31%

1M

-22.79%

6M

-39.07%

1Y

-14.63%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

-6.06%

1M

-2.95%

6M

-4.87%

1Y

8.34%

5Y*

13.98%

10Y*

10.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Symbol name

Symbol name

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XXXX vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XXXX

Overall Rank

Sharpe Ratio Rank

Sortino Ratio Rank

Omega Ratio Rank

Calmar Ratio Rank

Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC

Overall Rank

Sharpe Ratio Rank

Sortino Ratio Rank

Omega Ratio Rank

Calmar Ratio Rank

Martin Ratio Rank

The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XXXX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XXXX: -0.17

^GSPC: 0.46

XXXX: 0.27

^GSPC: 0.77

XXXX: 1.04

^GSPC: 1.11

XXXX: -0.21

^GSPC: 0.47

XXXX: -0.70

^GSPC: 1.94

The current XXXX Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XXXX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

XXXX

^GSPC

Drawdowns

XXXX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

XXXX

^GSPC

Volatility

XXXX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a higher volatility of 55.64% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 14.23%. This indicates that XXXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

XXXX

^GSPC